Friday, April 12, 2013

Fw: Community Meeting Notice for VPCCC

Fellow VPCCC Delegates: Reminder FYI
Thanks Hal!!
Larry
 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:07 PM
Subject: Community Meeting Notice for VPCCC
 

 

 

PLEASE share …

 

Community Meeting Notice
 

The Virginia Peninsula Car Club Council was established to support the Automotive Clubs and Auto Enthusiasts in the Va. Peninsula Region and surrounding areas.  VPCCC is a not-for-profit group (www.vpccc.org)

 

The VPCCC meets on the third Thursday of the month (Except Dec.)   at 7:00 pm 

We meet at Wynne Ford   1020 West Mercury Boulevard, Hampton, VA 23666   (757) 838-3673

 

April 18th   is our next meeting ..  We will have as our guest speaker Mr. Pat Fields , General Manager and he'll tell us more about Wynne Ford , tour the shop &  maybe  any  hobbyists' specials  … Plus we'll touch on many hobbyist related subjects.  Please consider coming as our guest.   Call or email Hal Hartel for more information.  

 

… let's try to have a great turnout for Pat  too. He's staying over his normal hours to speak with us and show us their shop!!!

 

 

FYI-We have clubs, individuals and businesses as members from Chesapeake, Charles City, Chester, Denbigh, Gloucester - Middle Peninsula, Hampton, Isle of Wight, James City County, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Smithfield, Suffolk, Va. Beach, Yorktown, York County, Williamsburg of Virginia and Elizabeth City & Outer Banks of  N.C.

 

 

 

Thanks,  Hal
Co-founder of  the Va Fall Classic
President of Va Peninsula Car Club Council


 "It is amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit!" Harry S. Truman

"We make a living by what we do, but we make a life by what we give"-Winston Churchill

Harold D. Hartel
100 Kayla Court
Yorktown, Va. 23693
757/867-6336
halhartel@gmail.com

www.VaFallClassic.org
www.VPCCC.org

 

 

 

 

Monday, April 8, 2013

TidewaterBiz Preview Edition: York development / Palace Plaza sold / new NN salon

You are viewing a preview edition of the TidewaterBiz newsletter, the free new business-focused email newsletter from the Daily Press Media Group that keeps you informed of the events and happenings that shape the Tidewater business landscape. To continue receiving this newsletter each Monday through Friday, click here to subscribe.

Latest Local Business News
$6.45 million sale moves York mixed-use development forward
A planned mixed-used development in York County moved a step forward with a $6.45 million property sale near Victory Boulevard at the York-Newport News line.
Since two Illinois employees sued Chesapeake-based Dollar Tree in November 2011, more than 6,000 hourly workers have joined the lawsuit that claims employees weren't paid when they worked off the clock, The Virginian-Pilot reported.
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News ranked 28th of 366 metropolitan statistical areas in the nation in Policom Corp.'s 2013 Economic Strength Rankings.
Axial Advisory Group joins nationwide appraisal firm
Axial Advisory Group, LLC with offices in Williamsburg, Chesapeake and Richmond has combined with 41 other appraisal firms to become part of nationwide appraisal firm Valbridge Property Advisors.
The Work Opportunity Tax Credit program will be temporarily extended to give employers a chance to file for credits by April 29.
New biz: Rocks Blow Dry Bar opens in Newport News
Newport News joined a growing trend in the country over the past years when Rocks Blow Dry Bar opened at 12515 Jefferson Ave. on March 1.
Network at the Virginia Peninsula Regional Chamber's next Coffee Connection 7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. April 9 at Virginia Company Bank at 2198 Coliseum Drive in Hampton.
POINT TO PONDER
"When you innovate, you've got to be prepared for everyone telling you you're nuts." - Larry Ellison, co-founder and CEO of major software company Oracle Corp.
Movers and Shakers (Notable accomplishments of local professionals)
Goodson joins 1st Advantage at Williamsburg Commons
1st Advantage Federal Credit Union announced that Todd Goodson joined the credit union as the newest relationship manager for their Williamsburg Commons branch.
ADVICE TO ADVANCE
How to be a team player as a company leader
Leaders routinely struggle to stop being in charge when they become part of a company team, but they can't just silently observe, either.
Business News In Video
Exec tells why he founded another company instead of retiring
Employee Corner (Jobs, career fairs, training and more)
Commercial Properties
Palace Plaza near Williamsburg sold
Cushman and Wakefield | Thalhimer announced the sale of Palace Plaza at 113 Palace Lane near Williamsburg.
Submit a press release View our partners

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Re: [Peninsula-Patriots] Another "take" on the Transportation Bill

#1.  The interstate building program did not start the recovery after WWII.  Having worked on some of the earliest sections I have more than a little history there. 
 
The recovery after WWII was primarily due to the stage set by the war and that had to do with the "GI" Bill. Many of the discharged came home not to a job or a line to stand in to get a job but in a line to go to school.  I have known many of those men during their lives. 
 
Look up when "Ike" introduced the Interstate system to Congress, he was elected in 1952 taking office in 1953 and the Highway Act was approved by Congress in 1956. 
WWII ended in 1945, 11 years before the Interstate system was approved.
 
There are many more errors but I will stop here. 
 
tom f
 
 
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruth Litschewski <ruth1860@aol.com>
To: Peninsula-Patriots-list <Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com>
Sent: Wed, Apr 3, 2013 3:58 pm
Subject: [Peninsula-Patriots] Another "take" on the Transportation Bill

Here is another take on the Transportation Bill.   The correspondence is Rob's (Quartel) response to Dave's (Davis) email - at the end.  Both highlight an urgency.   I believe it is important for our Peninsula Patriots to understand what is at stake in the high-stakes tax & control game.  We have a huge problem with roads and the solution, as always with government, is to throw more money (your money) at it.  Why are we never presented with the simple facts and asked to participate in the solution - except to pay the price.  Surely, there must be another way.  It is not too late to respond one way or the other.  Personally, I think we need to ask a lot more questions and have a lot more answers....  I'm feeling rushed - how about you?  This does not pass the smell test.  Were deals really made on the "waivers" for Obamacare in order to pass HB2313?  Politics!!!
Ruth


Dear Dave:

With all due respect, you are wrong on this.  All you have to do is recall how long it took to fix the Gwynn's Island Bridge, wait in line at the crossing over the Piankatank – which is going to take another two years at this pace -- drive down to Norfolk every day and wait in some of the worst traffic in the country like hundreds of shipyard and military workers from Mathews and Gloucester, try to make an appointment in Northern Virginia (from Fredericksburg on to DC) in what is officially the WORST traffic in the US now, worse even than LA or NYC – to know that we need to deal with the highway and traffic issue.  We have spent over 25 years doing nothing, no compromises from either side, and it's only gotten worse. 
Your car is Green, great.  But you should still pay something to use the highway.  They didn't appear miraculously from out of the sky.  I'd probably double the fee because you're using coal-fired electricity that pollutes as much as a gas-powered car.
One of the first expenditures of the First Congress was for US 1.  The Interstate highway system kick-started our recovery in high gear after WWII.  We are as a county Trillions of dollars in the hole on highway repairs, we're way behind on meeting new demand, and there's not a single government expenditure more important to creating jobs.
Being anti-tax just to be anti-tax isn't a rational political philosophy, and it sure isn't one that Ronald Reagan or Edmund Burke or any of the Founders would have considered to be a Conservative political governance philosophy – as in their brand of Conservatism, preservation of the basic functions and institutions of government included building the roads and other transportation that bind the nation together.
If your issue is the Bill's constitutionality, read this:  Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli told CBS 6 regarding transportation, "Based on our preliminary review, the governor's amendments address the constitutional concerns we have raised."
For the record, Northern VA, which constitutes 40 percent of the population of the Commonwealth, contributes over 60 percent of the revenue to support places like Mathews.  Norfolk/Hampton Roads isn't quite at the same ratio, but they're losers in the formula too.  Both of those jurisdictions SUPPORT the extra taxes because they want roads and they know it's the only way to get them.
I for one am calling everyone I know to SUPPORT the bill.  People on this committee who want their children to come back from college to a flourishing community, who want jobs, who want lower prices on things they shop for in the market (a direct byproduct of a strong transportation system) – should do the same.
Finally, I'm copying the Governor's message because it's worth reading and he makes the right arguments.  He's a true Conservative who knew what he had to do to be a leader and he did it.  You may not appreciate it now, but you will be grateful later.
RICHMOND—Governor Bob McDonnell today completed his review of the major transportation funding compromise passed by the General Assembly in late February. The bill substantially meets the goals established by the governor when he called for transportation investment and reform to be a top priority during the 2013 General Assembly session. However, the governor has proposed amendments to ensure that the provisions of the legislation do not negatively impact Virginia businesses and citizens, that they comply with the Virginia Constitution, and that Virginia's Executive Branch agencies can properly implement and administer the new and improved funding mechanisms.
The bill reflects the principles of the governor's introduced bill, which, as amended, reduces the gas tax by 35 percent and replaces it with a sales tax that grows with the economy, uses $200 million in current general funds, uses another $200 million in future general funds from the federal Marketplace Fairness Act, and ensures that alternative fuel vehicles pay a share of the maintenance of the roads.
"Virginia is now faced with the need to invest in our transportation system to ensure that our highway, rail and public transportation infrastructure is safe, efficient and reliable for our more than 8 million citizens," Governor McDonnell said. "I thank Republicans and Democrats in the House of Delegates and Virginia Senate for working together across party, philosophical and regional lines to solve one of our most vexing and longstanding legislative challenges. For 27 years Virginians have sat in traffic while partisan differences over how to address these challenges have stalled progress. The transportation funding and reform package that passed the General Assembly last month was an innovative solution that represents a realization that we must invest in our infrastructure to ensure our continued economic prosperity, safe roads for our citizens to travel, and an enhancement in their quality of life.
"In 1983, President Ronald Reagan proposed and signed legislation to more than double the national gasoline tax. When signing the bill, he said: 'We simply cannot allow this magnificent [transportation] system to deteriorate beyond repair. The time has come to preserve what past Americans spent so much time and effort to create, and that means a nationwide conservation effort in the best sense of the word. America can't afford throwaway roads or disposable transit systems. The bridges and highways we fail to repair today will have to be rebuilt tomorrow at many times the cost.'
"Virginia's economy depends upon a safe, reliable, efficient transportation system spanning all areas of the Commonwealth. This is why I have substantially agreed to the provisions in the compromise bill that passed our legislature, but have proposed multiple amendments to limit what it asks Virginians to contribute, to address potential legal questions regarding the regional taxing authority, and to clarify many administrative and technical aspects of the bill."
Governor McDonnell's key policy amendments include:
•       Reducing the proposed vehicle titling tax increase from 4.3 percent to 4.15 percent. After hearing from automobile dealers and constituents, the governor proposed this amendment to ensure the increase is reduced and does not adversely impact the number of vehicles purchased.
•       Reducing the Alternative Fuel Vehicles annual Fee from $100 to $64. The intent of this fee assessed to drivers of alternative fuel vehicles was to ensure that they are paying their share for the road maintenance and wear and tear caused by their vehicles. The original proposal for a $100 fee was based on a 17.5 cents per gallon gas tax.  The conference report establishes a lower rate of taxation on gasoline.  As such, this amendment ensures equity in how different types of vehicle fuels are taxed.
•       Correcting and reducing the rate of taxation for the regional congestion relief fee.  The stated goal for this fee was to raise approximately $30 million per year.  Based on slightly incorrect data, the fee was set at $0.25/$100 for real estate transactions.  Utilizing correct data, a rate of $0.15/$100 will generate the same revenue of $30 million per year.
•       Reducing the Transient Occupancy Tax in Northern Virginia.  At 3 percent, the TOT would place the tax in Northern Virginia near or above surrounding out-of-state jurisdictions.  Reducing the rate to 2 percent will not significantly impact revenues, but will ensure Virginia's hotels remain competitive.
•       Addressing potential legal questions regarding regional taxation authority for Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. Amendments are made to the sections imposing the regional taxes for transportation by the state to improve the legal posture of the law by changing the applicability of the taxes to any Planning District Commission meeting certain empirical thresholds including population, registered vehicles and transit ridership.  Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia are the only jurisdictions currently meeting these criteria, but in the future other parts of the Commonwealth could utilize these tools if their transportation challenges continue to grow.
•       Ensuring transportation funds generated by this legislation are only used for transportation. General provisions were added to the legislation to ensure that funds provided for in the statewide funding and regional plans remain dedicated to transportation in the years ahead. In making this commitment to fund this core function of state government, Virginians expect that commitment to be honored and that this funding is to be used solely for the purpose for which it was intended.
These amendments, combined with a series of technical and administrative amendments, will accomplish the goals established by the governor earlier this year by moving away from the declining gasoline tax and toward a more dynamic sales tax-based revenue source. The final version of HB2313 sponsored by speaker Bill Howell eliminates the 17.5 cent per gallon tax on gasoline, increases the state sales portion of the sales tax from 5 percent to 5.3 percent, dedicates revenues for the Commonwealth Mass Transit Fund and the Intercity Rail Operating and Capital Fund, and dedicates increased revenues for the Commonwealth Transportation Fund. Governor McDonnell's amendments would still result in over $5.9 billion in total revenue for transportation over the next five years This long-term transportation plan will generate thousands of jobs, create hundreds of millions of dollars in economic activity and provide the Commonwealth with the transportation infrastructure necessary to grow and prosper in the decades ahead. As a result of this plan, thousands of delayed construction and maintenance projects around the state will be funded, from widening I-64 between Newport News and Williamsburg, widening Route 28 in Northern Virginia, bringing down tolls on the Dulles Toll Road and advancing the Silver Line, bringing Amtrak service to Roanoke, and helping to build the Coalfields Expressway in Southwest Virginia. It will also eliminate the current unsustainable practice of taking money meant for new projects just to fund paving and pothole patching (currently equaling nearly $400 million annually).
"If we do not act now to solve the Commonwealth's transportation funding problem, the cost of delay will be much higher in the future" Governor McDonnell said. "I thank Speaker of the House Bill Howell for his leadership and many other persistent legislators to get this bill passed to ensure Virginian's economic prosperity, and to provide safe roads for our citizens and the quality of life they deserve.  I also thank Attorney General Cuccinelli for the assistance he and his Office provided to my Office throughout the process to highlight and address the legal questions raised."
###
Please rethink this and consider what it would mean to destroy this compromise.

Regards and best to all,
 
Rob
Rob Quartel
Chairman and CEO
NTELX, Inc. 
1945 Old Gallows Road, Suite 700  |  Vienna, Virginia 22182 
T:  703.356.5050 x111 |  E:  rquartel@ntelx.com
 
 
From Dave Davis to the Mathews Republican Committee:
 
I just got off the phone with Keith Hodges.  I told him that I polled the committee and not one single member told me that they were in favor of the Transportation bill.  (one gentleman told me he was in favor, but he is not a member of the committee.)  I told Keith that we wanted him to vote against the bill. Keith said that if this bill failed there was a possibility that the original bill would pass and the taxes would not be lowered.  He said lowered. Tax increases should be ELIMINATED not lowered.  I told him that he should vote no on both!  So what if the green car penalty goes from 100 to 64 dollars!!!!  That is still a tax increase!!! 
 
BURN UP THE PHONES TOMORROW.....................CALL THE OFFICES OF THESE RASCALS THAT WANT TO RAISE OUR TAXES.............MAKE THE CALL OR DON'T COMPLAIN TO ME IF 2313 PASSES.
 
Here is the site to get all the numbers:  http://votekeithhodges.com/?page_id=135     Make that call.  DO NOT SEND AN EMAIL AND EXPECT IT TO MEAN AS MUCH AS A CALL.  H
 
Dave
 
P. S.  Let me know if you called so I can publish a Wall of Fame.

 




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com)
This message was sent by Ruth Litschewski (ruth1860@aol.com) from Peninsula Patriots.
To learn more about Ruth Litschewski, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | support@meetup.com




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com)
This message was sent by Trudy Feigum (dakotasky109@aol.com) from Peninsula Patriots.
To learn more about Trudy Feigum, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | support@meetup.com

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

[Peninsula-Patriots] New transportation tax bill

Well the Virginia legislature did what should not have been done today when this new transportation bill was passed. Both Hodges and Northam voted in favor of it. You may want to let them know how you feel about that and remember it in the next election. If you would like to know more check out the email from Pat Evans today.
 Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 7:32 PM
Subject: "New Money" from HB 2313 for wasteful mass transit spending?



Simply raising fuel and sales taxes—only to allow costly, ineffective programs, including subsidized transit, to bleed those new revenues—fails to solve the underlying problem of misguided spending. 

Report: Hampton Roads Transit facing serious financial problems

http://hamptonroads.com/2013/03/report-hrt-facing-serious-financial-problems

The agency that runs the region's buses, light-rail line and other public transportation has serious problems with its finances, organizational structure and record-keeping. Without significant changes, HRT will be faced with an unmanageable fiscal situation within 2 years.                                                        
                                                                                                                                    
From Reid Greenmun
Hampton Roads TEA Party - Virginia Beach Chapter

I believe THIS is the first salvo in a media campaign to begin the lobbying for Hampton Roads Transit to siphon off as much of the new transportation funds as possible. Tom Holden used to work at the Pilot and HRT hired him as their Public Relations guy. Tom isn't wasting any time "working" the Pilot to stir up the Freeloader Class to demand that HRT fare increases are avoided (or reduced) and that the "new money" from HB 2313 will be used to "keep fares affordable" ...

What we have is a defacto regional light rail tax and a whole lot of other wasteful mass transit spending being added to the tax burden paid by the good people of Tidewater - well, the Productive Class anyway.

The problem with Hampton Roads Transit has always been a failed business model that depends upon charging people NOT RIDING the mass transit HRT provides to pay the majority of the costs incurred by HRT to provide the mass transit.

Hampton Roads Transit likes to point to "ridership" as a metric of success or "need"; often inaccurately depicted as "demand".

The truth is that if each ride on Norfolk's 7.4 mile light rail actually costs $15 for the service provided, how many people would pay $15 to ride 7.4 miles at an effective speed of 15 MPH?

None. Zip.

Hampton Roads Transit likes to market their service as a "bargain" when compared to the cost of driving and buying gas, etc. But that is only a bargain because so many of HRT's riders pay from ZERO to only $1.50 for a ride on their light rail train/trolley. Buses are subsidized roughly 80% by non-riders. That figure comes from HRT.  It may be worse!

Time is money - and HRT consumes MASSIVE time taking riders from point A to Point B.

This racket needs to be exposed for the unsustainable transit model it truly is. 

A bias is observed in the transport community towards an emphasis for public transit and non-motorized transportation as the dominant, if not sole, strategy towards sustainable transportation. Yet, almost all public transit systems are financially unsustainable, imposing burdens on the society.
From: http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch8en/conc8en/ch8c4en.html

                

Virginia and Maryland's Transportation Plans Fuel Tax Hikes, Not Mobility

The Heritage Foundation By Emily Goff    http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/03/virginia-and-maryland-s-transportation-plans-fuel-tax-hikes-not-mobility
The federal government's ultimate goal for transportation should be to devolve the resources and decision making to the states, who know their transportation needs better than Washington does.[1] Embracing devolution, however, does not equate to an endorsement of ill-conceived, misguided policy prescriptions. Two such examples are the plan recently passed by the Virginia General Assembly (HR 2313) and originally proposed by Governor Bob McDonnell (R) and the Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act of 2013 (HB 1515) under consideration in Maryland, a variation of Governor Martin O'Malley's (D) "Transportation Investment Plan."
Instead of trimming their budgets or reevaluating and reprioritizing their transportation spending, McDonnell and O'Malley have opted for tax hikes to fuel enormous transportation spending sprees, including on transit. Both governors plan to impose massive tax hikes on motorists and taxpayers, but they fail to address one big, lurking problem: wasteful deployment of resources, especially to programs that do not improve mobility. This flawed approach will only harm their state economies and further wring taxpayers' pocketbooks.
Both Plans Raise Taxes
Both the federal government and states are finding it a challenge to pay for legitimate transportation projects during this time of constrained budgets. The federal per-gallon gas tax has not been raised since 1993, and inflation has decreased the purchasing power of the revenue collected; many state gas taxes similarly have been left unchanged. Federal fuel tax revenues, for example, are projected to decrease and plateau, particularly as fuel-efficient vehicles and higher mileage standards lead to less fuel consumption.[2]
States and the federal government also divert a share of these revenues to a variety of programs that do little or nothing to reduce congestion, including transit but also bike paths and nature trails. Thus, Washington and the states are increasingly unable to cover highway and bridge maintenance costs, much less capital costs for adding capacity to reduce congestion.
McDonnell's and O'Malley's plans adopt a zealous approach to raising new revenue. Consequently, they have failed to consider whether the money would fund projects that cost-effectively move goods and people or benefit those funding them. Both plans consist of huge tax hikes, are tremendously complex, and contain provisions that rely on Congress passing flawed legislation.[3]
Failure to Fix the Transit Problem
Simply raising fuel and sales taxes—only to allow costly, ineffective programs, including subsidized transit, to bleed those new revenues—fails to solve the underlying problem of misguided spending.
Virginia's new plan will send 58 percent of revenues from the 0.3 percent sales tax increase to its Highway Maintenance and Operating Fund, but the remaining 42 percent will be diverted to mass transit.[4] This means a lower-income citizen in southwestern Virginia, for example, would be subsidizing with every nonfood purchase his more affluent Northern Virginia neighbors' commutes. Forcing this transfer of income will not serve the state well.
While it is unclear how much of its new revenue Maryland would funnel into transit, past experience suggests that future diversions are likely. From 2008 to 2012, the Maryland Department of Transportation spent about 50 percent of its highway and transit funding on transit, even though as of 2012, transit accounted for only 9 percent of the state's commuting and 4 percent of all travel.[5] O'Malley and state lawmakers have also diverted money from the Transportation Trust Fund to shore up the general fund, including $370 million in fiscal year 2010 alone. Though the plan under consideration contains a provision to bar future transfers, it would be via statute and not the state constitution, making it easier to open and raid the transportation funding "lockbox."
Both McDonnell and O'Malley would continue such diversions, partly because their states are scrambling for funds necessary to secure federal grants for planned multi-billion-dollar Metrorail system extensions: the Silver Line to Dulles Airport, the new Purple Line, and the Baltimore Red Line extension.
This proposed spending is particularly unwise; the new line to Dulles, for example, would lead to a negligible and fleeting reduction of traffic congestion—at a huge cost to taxpayers.[6]
Metro is already plagued by poor management and high operating costs, and it has resisted competitive contracting that would reduce costs and lead to better service. Equipment breakdowns and driver error often interrupt Metro service. Given the system's high costs and history of budget and performance problems, expansions such as those Virginia and Maryland are considering would make these problems worse.
Moreover, transit in general, even after decades of subsidies, has failed to reduce traffic congestion or air pollution or provide low-income citizens with practical transportation alternatives to access jobs.[7]
What About "User Pays"?
McDonnell and other lawmakers view the gas tax as outdated and increasingly ineffective. The gas tax is not a perfect funding method, but it is easy to collect and largely links the system's users to its costs. By contrast, Virginia's new sales tax—borne by all citizens—has minimal relationship to roads. As transportation expert Ronald D. Utt warns, which modes receive funding "will be determined by politics, not consumer choice, and the influential unions and environmentalists will be in a much better position to shift spending from cost-effective roads to costly and heavily subsidized and underutilized trolleys, trains, buses and bicycles."[8]
An overhaul of transportation funding may be necessary, but the sales tax hike is hardly the panacea some lawmakers would make it out to be.
Better Solutions to Pursue
Lawmakers could better use public funds and achieve the levels of mobility needed to facilitate economic growth by pursing the following reforms:
  • Dismantle barriers to public-private partnerships (P3s). State and federal lawmakers should act to end federal tolling restrictions on interstate highways, allowing states to expand P3 usage and leverage private-sector dollars for a small-scale upfront investment.
  • Phase-out the federal transit program. Congress should end rich federal subsidies by returning decision making and funding to the states on a five-year "glide-path"; states should then introduce cost-saving measures in their transit programs or fund more affordable and effective programs.
  • Commit to living within their means. While difficult, budget constraints can force lawmakers to prioritize their spending and fund only those programs that improve mobility and safety and reduce congestion.
Rethink Transportation Funding
In addressing transportation funding challenges, lawmakers should avoid saddling their citizens with onerous tax increases. Instead, they should examine current spending and rethink costly, underperforming programs in order to efficiently deploy resources while living within their means.
The onerous tax hikes that Virginia and Maryland would impose on their motorists, consumers, and businesses do not meet this test.
—Emily J. Goff is a Research Associate in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       






--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com)
This message was sent by DeWitt Edwards (l_edwards@verizon.net) from Peninsula Patriots.
To learn more about DeWitt Edwards, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | support@meetup.com

[Peninsula-Patriots] Another "take" on the Transportation Bill

Here is another take on the Transportation Bill.   The correspondence is Rob's (Quartel) response to Dave's (Davis) email - at the end.  Both highlight an urgency.   I believe it is important for our Peninsula Patriots to understand what is at stake in the high-stakes tax & control game.  We have a huge problem with roads and the solution, as always with government, is to throw more money (your money) at it.  Why are we never presented with the simple facts and asked to participate in the solution - except to pay the price.  Surely, there must be another way.  It is not too late to respond one way or the other.  Personally, I think we need to ask a lot more questions and have a lot more answers....  I'm feeling rushed - how about you?  This does not pass the smell test.  Were deals really made on the "waivers" for Obamacare in order to pass HB2313?  Politics!!!
Ruth


Dear Dave:

With all due respect, you are wrong on this.  All you have to do is recall how long it took to fix the Gwynn's Island Bridge, wait in line at the crossing over the Piankatank – which is going to take another two years at this pace -- drive down to Norfolk every day and wait in some of the worst traffic in the country like hundreds of shipyard and military workers from Mathews and Gloucester, try to make an appointment in Northern Virginia (from Fredericksburg on to DC) in what is officially the WORST traffic in the US now, worse even than LA or NYC – to know that we need to deal with the highway and traffic issue.  We have spent over 25 years doing nothing, no compromises from either side, and it's only gotten worse. 
Your car is Green, great.  But you should still pay something to use the highway.  They didn't appear miraculously from out of the sky.  I'd probably double the fee because you're using coal-fired electricity that pollutes as much as a gas-powered car.
One of the first expenditures of the First Congress was for US 1.  The Interstate highway system kick-started our recovery in high gear after WWII.  We are as a county Trillions of dollars in the hole on highway repairs, we're way behind on meeting new demand, and there's not a single government expenditure more important to creating jobs.
Being anti-tax just to be anti-tax isn't a rational political philosophy, and it sure isn't one that Ronald Reagan or Edmund Burke or any of the Founders would have considered to be a Conservative political governance philosophy – as in their brand of Conservatism, preservation of the basic functions and institutions of government included building the roads and other transportation that bind the nation together.
If your issue is the Bill's constitutionality, read this:  Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli told CBS 6 regarding transportation, "Based on our preliminary review, the governor's amendments address the constitutional concerns we have raised."
For the record, Northern VA, which constitutes 40 percent of the population of the Commonwealth, contributes over 60 percent of the revenue to support places like Mathews.  Norfolk/Hampton Roads isn't quite at the same ratio, but they're losers in the formula too.  Both of those jurisdictions SUPPORT the extra taxes because they want roads and they know it's the only way to get them.
I for one am calling everyone I know to SUPPORT the bill.  People on this committee who want their children to come back from college to a flourishing community, who want jobs, who want lower prices on things they shop for in the market (a direct byproduct of a strong transportation system) – should do the same.
Finally, I'm copying the Governor's message because it's worth reading and he makes the right arguments.  He's a true Conservative who knew what he had to do to be a leader and he did it.  You may not appreciate it now, but you will be grateful later.
RICHMOND—Governor Bob McDonnell today completed his review of the major transportation funding compromise passed by the General Assembly in late February. The bill substantially meets the goals established by the governor when he called for transportation investment and reform to be a top priority during the 2013 General Assembly session. However, the governor has proposed amendments to ensure that the provisions of the legislation do not negatively impact Virginia businesses and citizens, that they comply with the Virginia Constitution, and that Virginia's Executive Branch agencies can properly implement and administer the new and improved funding mechanisms.
The bill reflects the principles of the governor's introduced bill, which, as amended, reduces the gas tax by 35 percent and replaces it with a sales tax that grows with the economy, uses $200 million in current general funds, uses another $200 million in future general funds from the federal Marketplace Fairness Act, and ensures that alternative fuel vehicles pay a share of the maintenance of the roads.
"Virginia is now faced with the need to invest in our transportation system to ensure that our highway, rail and public transportation infrastructure is safe, efficient and reliable for our more than 8 million citizens," Governor McDonnell said. "I thank Republicans and Democrats in the House of Delegates and Virginia Senate for working together across party, philosophical and regional lines to solve one of our most vexing and longstanding legislative challenges. For 27 years Virginians have sat in traffic while partisan differences over how to address these challenges have stalled progress. The transportation funding and reform package that passed the General Assembly last month was an innovative solution that represents a realization that we must invest in our infrastructure to ensure our continued economic prosperity, safe roads for our citizens to travel, and an enhancement in their quality of life.
"In 1983, President Ronald Reagan proposed and signed legislation to more than double the national gasoline tax. When signing the bill, he said: 'We simply cannot allow this magnificent [transportation] system to deteriorate beyond repair. The time has come to preserve what past Americans spent so much time and effort to create, and that means a nationwide conservation effort in the best sense of the word. America can't afford throwaway roads or disposable transit systems. The bridges and highways we fail to repair today will have to be rebuilt tomorrow at many times the cost.'
"Virginia's economy depends upon a safe, reliable, efficient transportation system spanning all areas of the Commonwealth. This is why I have substantially agreed to the provisions in the compromise bill that passed our legislature, but have proposed multiple amendments to limit what it asks Virginians to contribute, to address potential legal questions regarding the regional taxing authority, and to clarify many administrative and technical aspects of the bill."
Governor McDonnell's key policy amendments include:
•       Reducing the proposed vehicle titling tax increase from 4.3 percent to 4.15 percent. After hearing from automobile dealers and constituents, the governor proposed this amendment to ensure the increase is reduced and does not adversely impact the number of vehicles purchased.
•       Reducing the Alternative Fuel Vehicles annual Fee from $100 to $64. The intent of this fee assessed to drivers of alternative fuel vehicles was to ensure that they are paying their share for the road maintenance and wear and tear caused by their vehicles. The original proposal for a $100 fee was based on a 17.5 cents per gallon gas tax.  The conference report establishes a lower rate of taxation on gasoline.  As such, this amendment ensures equity in how different types of vehicle fuels are taxed.
•       Correcting and reducing the rate of taxation for the regional congestion relief fee.  The stated goal for this fee was to raise approximately $30 million per year.  Based on slightly incorrect data, the fee was set at $0.25/$100 for real estate transactions.  Utilizing correct data, a rate of $0.15/$100 will generate the same revenue of $30 million per year.
•       Reducing the Transient Occupancy Tax in Northern Virginia.  At 3 percent, the TOT would place the tax in Northern Virginia near or above surrounding out-of-state jurisdictions.  Reducing the rate to 2 percent will not significantly impact revenues, but will ensure Virginia's hotels remain competitive.
•       Addressing potential legal questions regarding regional taxation authority for Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. Amendments are made to the sections imposing the regional taxes for transportation by the state to improve the legal posture of the law by changing the applicability of the taxes to any Planning District Commission meeting certain empirical thresholds including population, registered vehicles and transit ridership.  Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia are the only jurisdictions currently meeting these criteria, but in the future other parts of the Commonwealth could utilize these tools if their transportation challenges continue to grow.
•       Ensuring transportation funds generated by this legislation are only used for transportation. General provisions were added to the legislation to ensure that funds provided for in the statewide funding and regional plans remain dedicated to transportation in the years ahead. In making this commitment to fund this core function of state government, Virginians expect that commitment to be honored and that this funding is to be used solely for the purpose for which it was intended.
These amendments, combined with a series of technical and administrative amendments, will accomplish the goals established by the governor earlier this year by moving away from the declining gasoline tax and toward a more dynamic sales tax-based revenue source. The final version of HB2313 sponsored by speaker Bill Howell eliminates the 17.5 cent per gallon tax on gasoline, increases the state sales portion of the sales tax from 5 percent to 5.3 percent, dedicates revenues for the Commonwealth Mass Transit Fund and the Intercity Rail Operating and Capital Fund, and dedicates increased revenues for the Commonwealth Transportation Fund. Governor McDonnell's amendments would still result in over $5.9 billion in total revenue for transportation over the next five years This long-term transportation plan will generate thousands of jobs, create hundreds of millions of dollars in economic activity and provide the Commonwealth with the transportation infrastructure necessary to grow and prosper in the decades ahead. As a result of this plan, thousands of delayed construction and maintenance projects around the state will be funded, from widening I-64 between Newport News and Williamsburg, widening Route 28 in Northern Virginia, bringing down tolls on the Dulles Toll Road and advancing the Silver Line, bringing Amtrak service to Roanoke, and helping to build the Coalfields Expressway in Southwest Virginia. It will also eliminate the current unsustainable practice of taking money meant for new projects just to fund paving and pothole patching (currently equaling nearly $400 million annually).
"If we do not act now to solve the Commonwealth's transportation funding problem, the cost of delay will be much higher in the future" Governor McDonnell said. "I thank Speaker of the House Bill Howell for his leadership and many other persistent legislators to get this bill passed to ensure Virginian's economic prosperity, and to provide safe roads for our citizens and the quality of life they deserve.  I also thank Attorney General Cuccinelli for the assistance he and his Office provided to my Office throughout the process to highlight and address the legal questions raised."
###
Please rethink this and consider what it would mean to destroy this compromise.

Regards and best to all,
 
Rob
Rob Quartel
Chairman and CEO
NTELX, Inc. 
1945 Old Gallows Road, Suite 700  |  Vienna, Virginia 22182 
T:  703.356.5050 x111 |  E:  rquartel@ntelx.com
 
 
From Dave Davis to the Mathews Republican Committee:
 
I just got off the phone with Keith Hodges.  I told him that I polled the committee and not one single member told me that they were in favor of the Transportation bill.  (one gentleman told me he was in favor, but he is not a member of the committee.)  I told Keith that we wanted him to vote against the bill. Keith said that if this bill failed there was a possibility that the original bill would pass and the taxes would not be lowered.  He said lowered. Tax increases should be ELIMINATED not lowered.  I told him that he should vote no on both!  So what if the green car penalty goes from 100 to 64 dollars!!!!  That is still a tax increase!!! 
 
BURN UP THE PHONES TOMORROW.....................CALL THE OFFICES OF THESE RASCALS THAT WANT TO RAISE OUR TAXES.............MAKE THE CALL OR DON'T COMPLAIN TO ME IF 2313 PASSES.
 
Here is the site to get all the numbers:  http://votekeithhodges.com/?page_id=135     Make that call.  DO NOT SEND AN EMAIL AND EXPECT IT TO MEAN AS MUCH AS A CALL.  H
 
Dave
 
P. S.  Let me know if you called so I can publish a Wall of Fame.

 




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com)
This message was sent by Ruth Litschewski (ruth1860@aol.com) from Peninsula Patriots.
To learn more about Ruth Litschewski, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | support@meetup.com