Re: [Peninsula-Patriots] Another "take" on the Transportation Bill

#1.  The interstate building program did not start the recovery after WWII.  Having worked on some of the earliest sections I have more than a little history there. 

 

The recovery after WWII was primarily due to the stage set by the war and that had to do with the "GI" Bill. Many of the discharged came home not to a job or a line to stand in to get a job but in a line to go to school.  I have known many of those men during their lives. 

 

Look up when "Ike" introduced the Interstate system to Congress, he was elected in 1952 taking office in 1953 and the Highway Act was approved by Congress in 1956. 

WWII ended in 1945, 11 years before the Interstate system was approved.

 

There are many more errors but I will stop here. 

 

tom f

 

 

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruth Litschewski <ruth1860@aol.com>
To: Peninsula-Patriots-list <Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com>
Sent: Wed, Apr 3, 2013 3:58 pm
Subject: [Peninsula-Patriots] Another "take" on the Transportation Bill

Here is another take on the Transportation Bill.   The correspondence is Rob's (Quartel) response to Dave's (Davis) email - at the end.  Both highlight an urgency.   I believe it is important for our Peninsula Patriots to understand what is at stake in the high-stakes tax & control game.  We have a huge problem with roads and the solution, as always with government, is to throw more money (your money) at it.  Why are we never presented with the simple facts and asked to participate in the solution - except to pay the price.  Surely, there must be another way.  It is not too late to respond one way or the other.  Personally, I think we need to ask a lot more questions and have a lot more answers....  I'm feeling rushed - how about you?  This does not pass the smell test.  Were deals really made on the "waivers" for Obamacare in order to pass HB2313?  Politics!!!
Ruth

Dear Dave:

With all due respect, you are wrong on this.  All you have to do is recall how long it took to fix the Gwynn's Island Bridge, wait in line at the crossing over the Piankatank – which is going to take another two years at this pace -- drive down to Norfolk every day and wait in some of the worst traffic in the country like hundreds of shipyard and military workers from Mathews and Gloucester, try to make an appointment in Northern Virginia (from Fredericksburg on to DC) in what is officially the WORST traffic in the US now, worse even than LA or NYC – to know that we need to deal with the highway and traffic issue.  We have spent over 25 years doing nothing, no compromises from either side, and it's only gotten worse. 

Your car is Green, great.  But you should still pay something to use the highway.  They didn't appear miraculously from out of the sky.  I'd probably double the fee because you're using coal-fired electricity that pollutes as much as a gas-powered car.

One of the first expenditures of the First Congress was for US 1.  The Interstate highway system kick-started our recovery in high gear after WWII.  We are as a county Trillions of dollars in the hole on highway repairs, we're way behind on meeting new demand, and there's not a single government expenditure more important to creating jobs.

Being anti-tax just to be anti-tax isn't a rational political philosophy, and it sure isn't one that Ronald Reagan or Edmund Burke or any of the Founders would have considered to be a Conservative political governance philosophy – as in their brand of Conservatism, preservation of the basic functions and institutions of government included building the roads and other transportation that bind the nation together.

If your issue is the Bill's constitutionality, read this:  Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli told CBS 6 regarding transportation, "Based on our preliminary review, the governor's amendments address the constitutional concerns we have raised."

For the record, Northern VA, which constitutes 40 percent of the population of the Commonwealth, contributes over 60 percent of the revenue to support places like Mathews.  Norfolk/Hampton Roads isn't quite at the same ratio, but they're losers in the formula too.  Both of those jurisdictions SUPPORT the extra taxes because they want roads and they know it's the only way to get them.

I for one am calling everyone I know to SUPPORT the bill.  People on this committee who want their children to come back from college to a flourishing community, who want jobs, who want lower prices on things they shop for in the market (a direct byproduct of a strong transportation system) – should do the same.

Finally, I'm copying the Governor's message because it's worth reading and he makes the right arguments.  He's a true Conservative who knew what he had to do to be a leader and he did it.  You may not appreciate it now, but you will be grateful later.

RICHMOND—Governor Bob McDonnell today completed his review of the major transportation funding compromise passed by the General Assembly in late February. The bill substantially meets the goals established by the governor when he called for transportation investment and reform to be a top priority during the 2013 General Assembly session. However, the governor has proposed amendments to ensure that the provisions of the legislation do not negatively impact Virginia businesses and citizens, that they comply with the Virginia Constitution, and that Virginia's Executive Branch agencies can properly implement and administer the new and improved funding mechanisms.

The bill reflects the principles of the governor's introduced bill, which, as amended, reduces the gas tax by 35 percent and replaces it with a sales tax that grows with the economy, uses $200 million in current general funds, uses another $200 million in future general funds from the federal Marketplace Fairness Act, and ensures that alternative fuel vehicles pay a share of the maintenance of the roads.

"Virginia is now faced with the need to invest in our transportation system to ensure that our highway, rail and public transportation infrastructure is safe, efficient and reliable for our more than 8 million citizens," Governor McDonnell said. "I thank Republicans and Democrats in the House of Delegates and Virginia Senate for working together across party, philosophical and regional lines to solve one of our most vexing and longstanding legislative challenges. For 27 years Virginians have sat in traffic while partisan differences over how to address these challenges have stalled progress. The transportation funding and reform package that passed the General Assembly last month was an innovative solution that represents a realization that we must invest in our infrastructure to ensure our continued economic prosperity, safe roads for our citizens to travel, and an enhancement in their quality of life.

"In 1983, President Ronald Reagan proposed and signed legislation to more than double the national gasoline tax. When signing the bill, he said: 'We simply cannot allow this magnificent [transportation] system to deteriorate beyond repair. The time has come to preserve what past Americans spent so much time and effort to create, and that means a nationwide conservation effort in the best sense of the word. America can't afford throwaway roads or disposable transit systems. The bridges and highways we fail to repair today will have to be rebuilt tomorrow at many times the cost.'

"Virginia's economy depends upon a safe, reliable, efficient transportation system spanning all areas of the Commonwealth. This is why I have substantially agreed to the provisions in the compromise bill that passed our legislature, but have proposed multiple amendments to limit what it asks Virginians to contribute, to address potential legal questions regarding the regional taxing authority, and to clarify many administrative and technical aspects of the bill."

Governor McDonnell's key policy amendments include:

•       Reducing the proposed vehicle titling tax increase from 4.3 percent to 4.15 percent. After hearing from automobile dealers and constituents, the governor proposed this amendment to ensure the increase is reduced and does not adversely impact the number of vehicles purchased.

•       Reducing the Alternative Fuel Vehicles annual Fee from $100 to $64. The intent of this fee assessed to drivers of alternative fuel vehicles was to ensure that they are paying their share for the road maintenance and wear and tear caused by their vehicles. The original proposal for a $100 fee was based on a 17.5 cents per gallon gas tax.  The conference report establishes a lower rate of taxation on gasoline.  As such, this amendment ensures equity in how different types of vehicle fuels are taxed.

•       Correcting and reducing the rate of taxation for the regional congestion relief fee.  The stated goal for this fee was to raise approximately $30 million per year.  Based on slightly incorrect data, the fee was set at $0.25/$100 for real estate transactions.  Utilizing correct data, a rate of $0.15/$100 will generate the same revenue of $30 million per year.

•       Reducing the Transient Occupancy Tax in Northern Virginia.  At 3 percent, the TOT would place the tax in Northern Virginia near or above surrounding out-of-state jurisdictions.  Reducing the rate to 2 percent will not significantly impact revenues, but will ensure Virginia's hotels remain competitive.

•       Addressing potential legal questions regarding regional taxation authority for Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. Amendments are made to the sections imposing the regional taxes for transportation by the state to improve the legal posture of the law by changing the applicability of the taxes to any Planning District Commission meeting certain empirical thresholds including population, registered vehicles and transit ridership.  Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia are the only jurisdictions currently meeting these criteria, but in the future other parts of the Commonwealth could utilize these tools if their transportation challenges continue to grow.

•       Ensuring transportation funds generated by this legislation are only used for transportation. General provisions were added to the legislation to ensure that funds provided for in the statewide funding and regional plans remain dedicated to transportation in the years ahead. In making this commitment to fund this core function of state government, Virginians expect that commitment to be honored and that this funding is to be used solely for the purpose for which it was intended.

These amendments, combined with a series of technical and administrative amendments, will accomplish the goals established by the governor earlier this year by moving away from the declining gasoline tax and toward a more dynamic sales tax-based revenue source. The final version of HB2313 sponsored by speaker Bill Howell eliminates the 17.5 cent per gallon tax on gasoline, increases the state sales portion of the sales tax from 5 percent to 5.3 percent, dedicates revenues for the Commonwealth Mass Transit Fund and the Intercity Rail Operating and Capital Fund, and dedicates increased revenues for the Commonwealth Transportation Fund. Governor McDonnell's amendments would still result in over $5.9 billion in total revenue for transportation over the next five years This long-term transportation plan will generate thousands of jobs, create hundreds of millions of dollars in economic activity and provide the Commonwealth with the transportation infrastructure necessary to grow and prosper in the decades ahead. As a result of this plan, thousands of delayed construction and maintenance projects around the state will be funded, from widening I-64 between Newport News and Williamsburg, widening Route 28 in Northern Virginia, bringing down tolls on the Dulles Toll Road and advancing the Silver Line, bringing Amtrak service to Roanoke, and helping to build the Coalfields Expressway in Southwest Virginia. It will also eliminate the current unsustainable practice of taking money meant for new projects just to fund paving and pothole patching (currently equaling nearly $400 million annually).

"If we do not act now to solve the Commonwealth's transportation funding problem, the cost of delay will be much higher in the future" Governor McDonnell said. "I thank Speaker of the House Bill Howell for his leadership and many other persistent legislators to get this bill passed to ensure Virginian's economic prosperity, and to provide safe roads for our citizens and the quality of life they deserve.  I also thank Attorney General Cuccinelli for the assistance he and his Office provided to my Office throughout the process to highlight and address the legal questions raised."

###

Please rethink this and consider what it would mean to destroy this compromise.

Regards and best to all,

 

Rob

Rob Quartel

Chairman and CEO

NTELX, Inc. 

1945 Old Gallows Road, Suite 700  |  Vienna, Virginia 22182 

T:  703.356.5050 x111 |  E:  rquartel@ntelx.com

 

 

From Dave Davis to the Mathews Republican Committee:

 

I just got off the phone with Keith Hodges.  I told him that I polled the committee and not one single member told me that they were in favor of the Transportation bill.  (one gentleman told me he was in favor, but he is not a member of the committee.)  I told Keith that we wanted him to vote against the bill. Keith said that if this bill failed there was a possibility that the original bill would pass and the taxes would not be lowered.  He said lowered. Tax increases should be ELIMINATED not lowered.  I told him that he should vote no on both!  So what if the green car penalty goes from 100 to 64 dollars!!!!  That is still a tax increase!!! 

 

BURN UP THE PHONES TOMORROW.....................CALL THE OFFICES OF THESE RASCALS THAT WANT TO RAISE OUR TAXES.............MAKE THE CALL OR DON'T COMPLAIN TO ME IF 2313 PASSES.

 

Here is the site to get all the numbers:  http://votekeithhodges.com/?page_id=135     Make that call.  DO NOT SEND AN EMAIL AND EXPECT IT TO MEAN AS MUCH AS A CALL.  H

 

Dave

 

P. S.  Let me know if you called so I can publish a Wall of Fame.

 

--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com)
This message was sent by Ruth Litschewski (ruth1860@aol.com) from Peninsula Patriots.
To learn more about Ruth Litschewski, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | support@meetup.com

--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com)
This message was sent by Trudy Feigum (dakotasky109@aol.com) from Peninsula Patriots.
To learn more about Trudy Feigum, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | support@meetup.com